Praveen Kumar shot Hardik Pandya for giving more inclination to playing IPL and procuring heaps of cash than playing for the nation or for his homegrown group.
Previous India cricketer Praveen Kumar has made a serious charge on Hardik Pandya and his wellness daily after the India all-rounder joined the Mumbai Indians camp to start his arrangements for the 2024 Indian Premier League (IPL) season where he will be driving the five-time champions. Praveen tore separated Hardik charging that he has shown an example of getting harmed two months before the IPL and doesn’t turn up for the homegrown group, Baroda, or for his country as he has his emphasis on bringing in cash with his support in the league.
This isn’t the principal that the cricketing clique has experienced such discussions around Hardik. Other than it being a standard mumble via web-based entertainment each time Hardik caused a physical issue throughout the span of the most recent couple of years, veteran India all-rounder Irfan Pathan was quick to raise the point transparently from the cricket local area when Shreyas Iyer and Ishan Kishan had confronted BCCI’s fury over focusing on IPL over homegrown cricket as the two were eliminated from focal agreements. Both Ishan and Iyer, during their time away from public obligation, chose not to see the load up’s rehashed request to take part in the continuous Ranji Prize season. Thus, in a phenomenal step, BCCI eliminated both from the yearly retainers for the 2023/24 season.
Be that as it may, taking to X, Pathan addressed why Hardik, who doesn’t play white-ball homegrown counterparts for Baroda during time away from the Indian group, was seeking an exceptional treatment from the BCCI.
“They are capable cricketers, both Shreyas and Ishan. Trusting they quickly return and return more grounded. If players like Hardik would rather not play red ball cricket, would it be advisable for him and others like him partake in white-ball homegrown cricket when they aren’t on public obligation? In the event that this doesn’t have any significant bearing to all, then Indian cricket will not accomplish the ideal outcomes,” he had composed.
Talking a lot of on similar lines, in a clasp that has circulated around the web via virtual entertainment, Praveen shot Hardik for giving more inclination to playing IPL and procuring boatloads of money than playing for the nation or for his homegrown group.
You get harmed two months before the IPL, you don’t play for the country, you don’t play for your state in homegrown cricket, and just straightforwardly play in the IPL. That is not the way in which things ought to be finished. Bringing in cash, nothing bad can be said about that is not a problem. Yet, you need to play for state and nation and presently individuals just give significance to the IPL)”, Praveen said.
Praveen’s reaction arrived in a question to whether or not Mumbai Indians were right in eliminating Rohit Sharma, who drove them to five IPL titles, from captaincy and naming Hardik as their new chief.
In spite of the establishment nailing the explanation down to Rohit’s lessening numbers with the bat over the last couple of seasons, the previous Mumbai Indians bowler figured that the India commander might have kept on driving the side for an additional three years.
Indeed, Rohit can make it happen. For one year, however he can do it for two years, three years. However, in the long run, the choice lies in the possession of the administration,” the 37-year-old said.